To provide operational procedures that outline quality practices for internal self-evaluation and evaluation at the Otago Polytechnic Business Division of Te Pūkenga.
(TKM), Te Pūkenga Quality Management System and Te Pūkenga Kaupapa-here | Continuous Quality Improvement Policy.
The relevant Te Pūkenga Academic Policies, current Otago Polytechnic policies (as per Te Pūkenga Transitioning (Grandparenting) of Former Subsidiaries Policy) and the relevant Otago Polytechnic Business Division Procedures.
To provide operational procedures that outline quality practices for internal self-evaluation and evaluation at the Otago Polytechnic Business Division of Te Pūkenga.
4.1. Self-assessment focuses on programmes of study area performance in relation to Te Pūkenga’s strategic priorities.
4.2 Self-assessment activities and events are intended to lead to improved outcomes for ākonga and other stakeholders and meet internal and external quality assurance requirements.
6.1 It is the responsibility of the Formal Leader to ensure that a survey/feedback/evaluation plan is in place and that kaimahi are obtaining feedback from ākonga, customers and colleagues as required by OPBD.
6.2 Information on how all feedback processes work is available on Tūhono and from People and Culture.
6.3 Surveys will be conducted at a time which is appropriate and relevant to the individual survey type.
6.4 All courses are to be evaluated annually.
6.6 All survey data will be collated, and analysed, and individual reports will be accessible through online reporting portals provided to the kaimahi/programme of study/College/Service Area, as appropriate.
6.7 Ākonga will be provided with the response to their feedback on courses and programmes of study by their lecturer/Programme Lead/Head of College/or equivalent within one (1) month of the report being available to view.
6.8 In the case of concerning ākonga feedback, the Organisational Researcher will consult with the Deputy Chief Executive; Academic Delivery/or equivalent and Director: Academic Excellence/or equivalent about addressing this with the applicable Formal Leader.
7.1 Completed APERs are reviewed by the relevant Head of College/or equivalent who assigns ratings for performance dimensions and self-assessment capability along with an overall rating for performance and a rating for capability in self-assessment.
7.2 APERs for degree programmes of study that are self-monitoring are submitted to NZQA along with a summary report.
7.3 An overall summary and analysis of APER reports is provided to Te Kāhui Manukura and Academic Committee.
Policies
V3.1